April 9, 2014

St. Marina humiliating (and hammering) the devil

Have you noticed that there are an alarming number of combative females on television these days?  I’m not necessarily talking about women who are angry at everything besides baby kittens and goldfish, but rather women who play “tough-guy” characters.  The men are the calm writers or the slackers who need protection, while it’s the women who are getting their butts kicked by the bad guys, running headfirst into burning buildings and calling their female supervisors, “sir”.  The trend has been growing since before Uma Thurman “Killed Bill”, but it’s alarming to me that our society is normalizing (and glorifying) women in physically dangerous roles.  Doesn’t it bother you, I asked my husband once, to watch a female get walloped by a male?  Or to watch two women swinging punches at each other?  He thought for a minute and said, “yes, but I tell myself they’re fighting the bad guy and that makes me feel better about it.” 

Not me.  I wince.  Every.  Single. Time.  There’s something about watching a woman in a violent fist fight that just grates against everything I hold as good, true and beautiful.  Something in it just isn’t right and I’m not exactly sure what it is. 

There is hot debate that’s been raging for some years now – whether or not women should be accepted into physically dangerous, violent careers – like military combat forces - and it’s increasingly being won by the “pro” side.  Women have been battling, in the name of equality, to be treated as men and our society is responding.  If we women, in fact, are the same as men then what excuse do we have but to actually start doing what men have always traditionally done?  So now that we open doors for ourselves and have ceased ascribing to the “evil patriarchy” for our self-worth, we de facto must take on careers like wrestling, boxing, firefighting, and hard-core military combat careers.  Now that we’re “equal” we are obligated to fight hard, just like men.  Right?   

Fulton Sheen had a different idea.  First of all, men and women are equal – but proportionally so, not mathematically.  In his book entitle “Love, Marriage and Children” he said,

“The catchword became “equality,” which meant roughly: “Anything you can do I can do better.” Equality meant uniformity, or exactly the same amount of everything for everybody.  It was forgotten that there are two kinds of equality: mathematical and proportional equality.  For example, a mother does not give the same clothes, same food, same spending money to a son of two that she gives to a sixteen year old girl; but as a good mother, she gives proportional equality, according to age, needs, and physical and spiritual differences.”

Men and women are equal in dignity and value as human persons, yet about as different as a two-year-old son is from a sixteen year old daughter.  We not only don’t do the same jobs in exactly the same way, we shouldn’t.   Why would we? Men have one set of gifts.  Women have another set – which I don’t believe (generally) include really big muscles.  Although I am certain that some women enjoy bodybuilding and strength training and could best a good number of opponents, man or woman, anytime they felt like it, but they’re the exceptions.  I’m not convinced that generally speaking women are the best candidates for hard-core, physically demanding careers – especially where the military is concerned. 

A local radio station often plays a commercial where the announcer states: “At  -- FM we believe that you are only limited by your imagination.  And your time.  And your ability.  And your money.”  He goes off to list a few more things by which we’re all limited and I laugh every time I hear it.  We (both men and women) like to think that we are limitless in our abilities; that we can do anything of which we can conceive the moment we think of it.  It’s even what we like to tell our kids, but I think the concept is just stupid.  If I’m 4 foot 1 and clumsy I will find it extremely difficult to be a ballet dancer.  Sure I could do everything in my power to achieve the goal of being a ballet dancer but it’s very likely I will never be as good as those who’ve been given the ballet dancer’s tall, willowy genes.  Even if I achieve an acceptable level of ability by working triple-hard, it’s still very likely that I won’t ever come close to obtaining the ability of those who have an in-born talent.  That’s life.

This is how I see women in combat positions.  Our bodies and spirits weren’t made for that type of thing and no matter how much we’d like to, we cannot force our genetic makeup to change.  While women generally have better endurance than men, men generally have more skeletal muscle mass than women, which typically makes them physically stronger.  On a good day, could the strongest woman in any given group best the strongest man?  Maybe.  But highly doubtful.  No matter how much weight and strength training they undergo, women cannot make themselves grow more muscle mass to equal men’s.  In addition, many women experience extreme muscle weakness in the days leading up to menstruation – some say they lose up to half their physical strength.  Women cannot force their bodies to be as consistently strong as men, which is decidedly not an asset when innocent human lives are on the line. 

But even beyond certain physical differences between men and women, combative careers require women to expunge from themselves that which many would consider their greatest asset: their emotions and relational sensibilities.  Military women must cut ties with their children for months on end while deployed.  And it’s not hard to see why those in combat must keep all emotions in check.  Horrible things are done and experienced in times of war – and men are able to compartmentalize the horrors a little bit better than women.  Of course I’m generalizing.  There will likely be an exceptional person to disprove every rule, but generally speaking, this is true.

So what now?  Should all women be pigeonholed into a small list of “feminine” occupations like they have been in the past; careers like nanny, tea-pourer or dressmaker? I don’t think so.  Rather I think all women must identify their gifts and strengths, and give what they’ve got, not what they haven’t got.  Most women aren’t suited to military combat and wrestling in the same way that most men aren’t suited to synchronized swimming or feminine hygiene product tester.  Does that make either any less of a person – because they have talents in one area over another?  No.  Emphatically no.  Yet I think the current thought is that because women generally aren’t suited to combat, that they are somehow “less than”, “inferior” or “weak”. 

What a silly notion - but I understand why it’s a pervading thought.  In her book The Privilege of Being a Woman, Alice von Hildebrand said:

“The hierarchy of values being upset [at the Fall], male accomplishments became overvalued.  Physical strength became glorified and weakness was looked down upon as proof of inferiority.  ..Hand in hand with the overestimation of strength and virility goes an overestimation of accomplishments, feats, performances, success.  In our society to be a “self-made man” calls for awe.  A Bill Gates, an Oprah Winfrey, or even a Bill Clinton inspires people with a totally illegitimate feeling of admiration.”

We’ve come to believe, since the Fall, that only certain gifts and talents are highly valued: strength, virility, prowess, being “self-made” or powerful – the noticeably shining “virtues” of our modern world.  Those who cannot acquire those “virtues” – or have different or opposite abilities to those specified - are substandard, lesser human beings.  What about humility?  Charity?  Loyalty, compassion and obedience?  They’re real virtues that our world can’t stand. To the modern, untrained eye, humility and grace look shabby and dull next to novelty and dazzling pride. 

Yet choosing to do something that may be well beyond the limits of our physical, mental or psychological strength, merely because we believe that doing so is the only way to be valued, is a suicide of sorts.  We put to death an important part of our very selves (ie. our femininity) in order to meet the requirements of “the job” and in the process utterly discount our value and worth as a woman - as ourselves.  Perhaps this is why I find it so jarring to see women being physically violent on tv, because I instinctively feel that they are setting something truly authentic aside for something counterfeit.  Or perhaps it’s simply because I know that most women wouldn’t stand a chance in a fight against the average man.  It’s not a fair fight, no matter how much some would try to convince you otherwise. 

So why does it matter that women are accepted as “tough guys”, able to best any man, woman or child that walks through the door?   I honestly don’t know because women, within themselves, ARE tough.  They are fierce – just not in the way society thinks they should be, that is, in the way that men are fierce.   They may not break your neck with their bare hands, but threaten their loved ones and you’ll wish you’d never been born.  Women are highly intuitive – they will be able to ascertain important facts about situations that many wouldn’t figure out in a million years. Most women have the ability to multi-task: doing 18 things with one hand while pouring a glass of wine and sending 5 emails with the other.  They have a deep wellspring of strength and a supernatural ability to sacrifice themselves that puts many a man to shame.  And best of all, women are able to shelter, nourish and grow new life within themselves: a gift that is a privilege and an honour to possess.  All of this isn’t to brag, but to enlighten. 

And just as the physical strength of every man (and every one of their other abilities) is needed in the world, the gifts of all women are also needed wherever there are people - whether it be a courtroom, the military, a household or a kitchen. We might have been historically referred to as the weaker sex, but I think that men and women are both weak and strong, in their own unique ways.  So what if women are physically weaker than men.  Maybe men are spiritually weaker than women, but that’s not a bad thing.  Men and women not only need each other’s strengths, but they also need each other’s weaknesses.  Weaknesses help to spur us on to be better individuals - we realize we’re not “there yet”.  They can motivate us to support one another and help us to be humble and honest in admitting to our needs.  And they keep us vulnerable (in a good way) and can increase intimacy between two people (if we allow them) as long as both parties understand the importance of both strengths and weaknesses, and treat the other accordingly. 

Because in the end, what matters isn’t that I benched 200 pounds or was able to do 75 squats, but that I used my abilities to their fullest to help myself and others to gain heaven.  Is there anything more fulfilling than doing just that – using your expertise to change lives, or allowing others to share their expertise with you?  Like a doctor saving a life by clearing a windpipe or a violinist bringing her audience to tears, there’s nothing better than doing what we’re meant to do, when we’re meant to do it.  It’s thrilling and satisfying and an adventure from beginning to end. 


“To fulfill [her] mission, a woman has to develop her own personality and not let herself be carried away by a naive desire to imitate, which, as a rule, would tend to put her in an inferior position and leave her unique qualities unfulfilled. If she is a mature person, with a character and mind of her own, she will indeed accomplish the mission to which she feels called, whatever it may be. Her life and work will be really constructive, fruitful and full of meaning, whether she spends the day dedicated to her husband and children or whether, having given up the idea of marriage for a noble reason, she has given herself fully to other tasks. Each woman in her own sphere of life, if she is faithful to her divine and human vocation can and, in fact, does achieve the fullness of her feminine personality. Let us remember that Mary, Mother of God and Mother of men, is not only a model but also a proof of the transcendental value of an apparently unimportant life.”  ~St. Josemaria Escriva

2 comments:

  1. Once again, Jason and dave are watching the same shows! Have you noticed that these female Rambos never put their hair back in a ponytail. They enter combat with their ultra-long tresses stylishly curled at the ends and never in need of untangling. They also seem to be allowed to only wear tight pantsuits or jeans with leather jackets. Typecasting galore!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SO true! And their hair never gets in their way. And they're wearing 6 inch heels…running in them…kicking ppl. Yeah. Right. That would work.

      Delete

About



What is a woman? What does it mean to be feminine? There is softness and hardness, compassion and ferocity. There is contentment and adventure, freedom and service. We're conundrums, especially to ourselves, but we all, in some way, possess beauty, creativity, intuition and love. We were made for love, and we are loved, cellulite and all. Here we aim to show every woman the richness and beauty of her own femininity and explore current issues relating to women in our world. We also wish to share our own experiences - exploring the joys and challenges of stay-at-home moms and single professionals and everyone in between. Welcome! So glad you're here!

Follow


Follow by Email

Search

Popular Posts

Powered by Blogger.